Wikileaks is a treasure trove of the private-turned-public. It is full of documents produced by international governments, whistleblowers, corporations, and multiple other organizations. The documents collected from these organizations are meant to be kept hidden, as they contain information was meant to be censored, or even erased. According to the “About” page on Wikileaks, they procure these hidden gems relating to “war, spying and corruption,” and, according to founder Julian Assange, “We give asylum to these documents, we analyze them, we promote them and we obtain more.” This library of classified information promotes transparency between Us (citizens of the United States and other countries worldwide) and Them (organizations whose activities supposedly warrant the use of encryption and secrecy). Some would argue that Wikileaks is a threat to national security, and that its very existence threatens the safety of the American people. However, there is little to no evidence to suggest that this is the case. Wikileaks breaks ground that was only ever trod on by the likes of Daniel Ellsberg (leaker of the Pentagon Papers), Edward Snowden (so-called whistleblower on the NSA’s use of surveillance on the American people), and a few other brave souls who sought to awaken citizens to the corruption that corporations and government agencies sought to blind us from.
Wikileaks has been internationally recognized as a sort of political Robin Hood. Its seizure of documents from these political power, and its deliverance of those documents to citizens, has proved it worthy of many esteemed recognitions and awards. There are hypothetical risks of releasing sensitive information to the public, but are those risks greater than the threat of ignorance and blind patriotism? Wikileaks supports the right of citizens to be aware of, and in charge of, the political happenings around them. With an increasing level of disenchantment of the American people with its government and corporations, how could we as citizens not agree with the thought of taking power back into our own hands through the exposure of knowledge? Wikileaks is deserving of all of its support, as it gives Us more leverage from Them. Despite growing support of Wikileaks, there have been many attempts by international governments to silence the organization. Julian Assange has been held without charge, has been brought to court many times for exposing information, and has had death threats put upon him. The word whistleblower holds many negative feelings, but I think that word should be reclaimed. It means one who seeks to enlighten people with the truth. How is that negative?
As for whether the extended account from Wikileaks regarding the search for Bowe Bergdahl contradicts the account given by Serial 2, I do not necessarily think that the two conflict severely, but I do think that the Serial 2 podcast wishes to highlight the discrepancy between the various accounts of where Bergdahl might be located. In the podcast, the host makes a valid point that depending on who you talk to, the small details vary drastically, but the main plot points stay consistent. Serial 2’s summary of the Wikileaks transcripts filter out the details that either led nowhere, were inconsistent, or were extremely time sensitive. For example, Serial 2’s timeline left out all of July 2nd and 3rd. According to the extended account from the military, on July 2nd, they “DETAINED 25 FOR TACTICAL QUESTIONING” (July 2nd, 0246z), they were “CONDUCTING [Key Leader Engagement] WITH ELDERS OF MEST AND COMMANDERS OF [Afghan National Police]” (July 2nd 0447z), they followed leads about certain vehicles (July 2nd 0542z, July 2nd 0644z-0653z, July 2nd 0743z), they captured 4 suspected Taliban members (July 2nd 0904z), a proposed trade deal between the Taliban of “15 OF THEIR TALIBAN BROTHERS IN U.S. JAIL AND SOME MONEY IN EXCHANGE FOR PVT BERGDAHL” (July 2nd 0708z). On July 3rd, the military emptied buildings and were conducting search procedures and missions.
Serial 2 left out these days entirely, presumably because none of the events that occurred that day led to any new, big developments that contribute to the ultimate timeline of events in the search. The podcast covers points and events that all parties involved with/interviewed about could all corroborate and agree on. Also a majority of the updates put forth by the Serial 2 podcast had to deal with sightings of Bergdahl, or relate directly to Bergdahl’s state of being/wellbeing, whereas the military updates provided more information that highlighted the military’s actions and state of operation. In a way I think this is Serial 2’s way of trying to humanize Bowe or at least shift the focus from the military’s perspective, and more toward Bowe’s perspective.